Sunday, January 27, 2008

Blog #3- Moral Pyromaniac?

     The fire is set before we enter. Small tinders have begun a slow burn and Iago's schemes are merely ideas. However, none of these ideas show the respect one would attribute with a religion, especially one with Othello as God. Iago's first words about Othello are "but he; as loving his own pride and purposes, evades them, with a bombast circumstance horribly stuff'd with epithets of war. . . ." His words hardly seem respectful, much less reverent, as would befit a God-like figure.
     As far as treating war like a religion, Iago shows in-depth knowledge of battle and rankings, but again lacks commitment to it. Form the beginning, Iago undermines the workings of their navy. He sets fire to the traditions of loyalty and honor and informs us of his ideas regarding Othello as the leader of their war. He says, "We cannot all be masters, nor all masters connot be truly follow'd. . . . Others there are who . . . keep yet their hearts attending on themselves, and, throwing but shows of service on their lords, . . . do themselves homage . . . and such a one do I profess myself."
    We know Iago considers himself intellectually above Othello, but envies his morals. We know Iago torches these morals toward the end of the play. We know that Iago enjoys playing with the other characters' minds during his battle. But Iago doesn't seem to view his war as a game or a religion. The moral pyre Iago builds holds great importance to Iago, but lacks the emotional depth normally shown toward a religion. Iago acts with diligence; he is more careful than he would be if playing a game. Especially toward the end, there is nothing game-like about his attitude. His future and reputation hinge on whether or not his plan works.

Friday, January 11, 2008

Blog Post #2 -

The most problematic part of Oedipus Rex for me is the fact that he was running the country. On the surface, he may appear to have all of the qualifications necessary for a leader - he has a strong voice, great credentials, a moral conscience, and experience in problem solving. Dig an inch deeper, and his story falls apart.
Firstly, he may have solved the Sphinx riddle by some fluke, but he does not possess much intelligence beyond that. Any idiot could see the similarities in Laios's prophecy and Oedipus's, whether they feel innocent or not. Instead of viewing the claim that he wasn't Polybos's child with mild interest and only a passing glance, Oedipus ought to have started interrogating himself the moment he heard that story.
Also, having a leader who kills someone out of mere road rage doesn't seem like the best idea. Does Oedipus show any fairness in this act? Decency? A little understanding for others? Not by any stretch of the imagination.